Not exactly a wonderful one and (though just by numbers) smaller picture, but it actually shows more photographic grain where the one you put shows digital artifacts, this one has better colour and, at close look, it certainly has more detail (compared side to side at 100%). I would bet yours is a blow-up from this one (they're too identical in other aspects to don't share source and I have to assume the bad one comes from the good one of course 😛):
http://the.hitchcock.zone/files/gallery/org/5763.jpgYet, I guess you wanted something much better than both of them... in that case sorry, got nothing.